Martial Law Is Now In Place In America - FEMA Set To Take Over

When President Barack Obama was campaigning for the presidency back in 2008, he used a certain one-word slogan and I think we all remember what that was: change. But of course, he never really defined what kind of change we were going to get, whether it be good or bad. Now that it's nearing election time again, I think it's pretty safe to say that it wasn't good change he was talking about. If you've been paying any attention to what FEMA and DHS do, you must be pretty alarmed by now. Martial law is now in place in America, all that needs to happen now is the trigger being pulled. In case you aren't familiar with the term, here's the legal definition: the exercise of government and control by military authorities over the civilian population of a designated territory. 

Obviously, this is a big problem, especially because we have multiple laws to protect U.S. citizens from such a disaster (3rd and 10th amendments, and the Posse Comitatus Act).

About a week or so ago, ATK secured a contract with the Department of Homeland Security to supply them with 450 million rounds of .40 caliber hollow points for the next 1 - 5 years. They're also currently seeking a contractor to supply them with an additional 175 million rounds of .223 caliber, if you don't know, that's what goes in semi-automatic rifles like AR-15s. For what possible scenario could DHS need more than 2 bullets for every citizen in the country? And why do FEMA and military personnel need transponders designating we, the people as the enemy?

In December of last year, Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown, and Root secured a contract with FEMA to activate detention camps within 72 hours and to provide services such as temporary fencing and barricades, catering services, medical and laundry services, power generation, refuse collection, and other services required for a temporary “emergency environment.” It was also KBR that received a contract in 2006 with DHS worth up to $385 million to construct these detention camps. The "legal" precedent was set by the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act which allowed these camps to be built. Since I'm on the subject of legal precedent, let's look at some FEMA-related Executive Orders.

1. 12148: created FEMA to inteface with the Department of Defense for civil defense planning and funding.
2. 12656: appointed the National Security Council as the principle body that should consider emergency powers.
3. 10990: allows FEMA to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seasports.
4. 10095: allows FEMA to seize and control the communication media.
5. 10997: allows FEMA to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels, and minerals.
6. 10998: allows FEMA to take over all food resources and farms.
7. 11000: allows FEMA to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
8. 11001: allows FEMA to take over all health, education, and welfare functions.
9. 11002: designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
10. 11003: allows FEMA to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
11. 11004: allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
12. 11005: allows FEMA to take over all railroads, inland waterways, and public storage facilities.
13. 11051: specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic of financial crisis.
14. 11310: grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liason, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
15. National Defense Resources Preparedness: allows the Federal government to confiscate all food, water, and skilled people by declaring a state of national emergency. Really just an updated format for the older executive orders, the only difference is that it allows the President to declare a national emergency during peacetime, rather than the threat of a nuclear attack.

Call me crazy but I think its pretty unreasonable that FEMA takes over our transportation, highways, rivers, communication media, any kind of fuel, food, water, farms, resources, health, education, welfare, gets to "relocate populations", say what areas of the country are off-limits, take over railroads, storage facilities, all aircraft, and take us all into forced labor camps if a national emergency is declared. Am I being unreasonable or is this just plain ridiculous? They get to seize control of basically everything and by that time, they'll have about 650 million bullets ready to be used...on us. If you're thinking "Hey now, our government would never do something so cruel. They would never place citizens in camps and treat like slaves and steal their property", well, they've done that already. Think back to World War II and what event brought the U.S. to join the war. We were attacked by Japan at Pearl Harbor, and then we flew over there and nuked them. Do you remember what happened to the Japanese-American citizens that had immigrated here? The government forced them into labor camps throughout the duration of the war. For almost 5 years, our government kept them in the camps against their will for their "safety." For the same reason that we need to have TSA at the airports, on highways, bus stations, and train stations, to "protect us" from the non-existent terrorists.

If you've been to an airport since 9/11, you're probably familiar with the TSA and I'll bet you aren't a very big fan of them either. They should be called the Temporary Security Agency instead because that's all they are. TSA is being used to break our will during peacetime until a national emergency is declared, because they sure as hell aren't protecting any of us. To show you just how ineffective they are, let's check out their "top 10 good catches of 2011". The word 'terrorist' isn't even mentioned in the list. Number 10, snakes, turtles, and birds...'cause that'll bring down a plane, right? Then we have a science project, a concealed non-metallic martial arts weapon, inert landmines, a stun gun, and 1,200 guns (for the entire year), and nmber 2 was a loaded .308 caliber pistol. Lastly, and almost as ridiculous, a "small chunk of C4 explosives". Just a small chunk? They also strip search 80 year old women, 3 who have come forward about it from one airport. Sure they've apologized, but actions speak louder than words especially when they just keep on doing it. Just like how they strip search little kids and babies, and how the government gets away with torture by calling it "pain compliance."

(I, having a soul, find this picture morally disturbing and it makes me sick to my stomach but it is necessary to illustrate just how backwards this country has become.)




Oh how I love living in the land of the free.

The "Kony 2012" Campaign Is A Big Scam

You've probably seen it, or at least heard about it recently, and what I'm talking about is the video that's going viral called "Kony 2012." I figured before I decided to get behind a cause, I wanted to do some research into it and what I found was pretty disturbing. The video was made as a way to enlighten people of the crimes of Joseph Kony, the leader of the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) which is a militant group based out of northern Uganda and is also known for terrorizing citizens in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Central African Republic, Sudan and South Sudan. Kony is a war criminal who has kidnapped an estimated 30,000 children and forced them to fight for his movement, as well as many other unspeakable acts such as rape and murder. He is also responsible for the displacement of over 2 million people.

The LRA came into existence at the end of the Ugandan-Bush War (1981 - 1986) which was an uprising of militia groups, the Popular Resistance Army (led by Yoweri Museveni) and the Ugandan Freedom Fighters, which merged to form the National Resistance Army. The end result of the war was the outing of, then president, Tito Okello after the NRA ceased the capitol, with Yoweri Museveni as the new president of Uganda (Museveni is still president to this day). Something that the video producers seemed to be completely oblivious to is the fact that the current president has been responsible for the genocide of approximately 7 million people in Uganda and the surrounding countries. Kony is just leading the resistance to Museveni's rule, which both began around the same time. The disturbing part though is that both men have been accused of working for the CIA, Kony for both CIA and Mossad, and it has been alleged that Museveni is being blackmailed by them.

Now that we've covered the basic background, let's get into how this is a scam to invade central Africa. Maybe you've heard of the bank called JP Morgan Chase, well they play a huge part in this, even bigger than the CIA. They're funding the scum that is Joseph Kony's movement, one of Invisble Children's listed network of supporters is Chase Community Giving (which is a branch of the JP Morgan Chase Foundation, who donated the hefty sum of $1 million towards the production of the film), as well as another organization called Chase Military which offers loans, mortgages, and insurance to soldiers deployed abroad. So what exactly do they have to gain by inading central Africa? Well for one, the vast amount of resources such as fertile soil and regular rainfall, in 1986 agriculture accounted for 56% of the country's GDP. It also has sizable deposits of copper and cobalt, as well as crude oil and natural gas (it has been admitted that oil is the reason we're still in the middle east). Africa has such vast resources because throughout history it has been largely undeveloped. 85% of African oil is produced by Nigeria, Libya, Algeria, Egypt, and Angola. You may remember last year that president Obama, without Congressional approval, sent troops into Libya and it is now under the control of Al-qaeda (another CIA funded terrorist group).

Now back to the scam. As you know, Kony and the LRA are responsible for the internal displacement of between 2.1 and 2.4 million people. Because that many people are without a place to sleep, CIA opperative Museveni was more than happy to help provide camps for the IDPs (Internally Displaced Persons). But the program was also funded by the admitted eugenicist run Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill Gates gave a speech in February 2010 saying that if we do a "really good job" we could "reduce population by 10 or 15%". Isn't it a bit odd that someone who openly says we should lose about a billion people is funding the program to put the displaced Ugandans into camps?
I know you've all heard the saying that "if you don't know history, you're doomed to repeat it" so let's look into how this scenario parallels with bin Laden and the middle east. Both Kony and bin Laden are leaders of CIA funded terrorist groups, bin Laden was an agent from the 80s until the 9/11 attacks and Kony has been for about two decades so it's about the same time frames for them. Both groups are the "resistance groups" of the region. In case you didn't know, the CIA can't even confirm that Kony is still alive today. When Obama reported last year that bin Laden had been killed, that was the ninth time a high-ranking official pronounced him dead. The first time was in Pakistan in 2002, George Bush sent troops into Afghanistan and Iraq to "hunt him down" but a decade later, they still haven't found him. The CIA can't even confirm that Joseph Kony is still in Uganda, or if he's still alive. If you've seen the Kony 2012 film and support the cause, maybe you should pause it at about 15:04. The picture below is straight out of the film and admits that Kony hasn't been to Uganda in almost 6 years.

So is this a scam? Regardless of whether or not the lower levels of the organizations are consciously evil or just useful idiots, you can't deny that this cause is being exploited at the higher levels to spark yet another US military intervention under the guise of "humanitarianism". Regardless of whether or not you agree with the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq, you cannot deny that thousands of innocent civilians are dying as a result of US military intervention. There's a right and a wrong way to do everything, a US invasion to hunt down a man who has left the country is not the right way to go about this. If you really care about the well being of the Ugandans, you'll want to hold these organizations pushing for intervention responsible. Please help get this information out. It's not too late to turn things around, we can prevent this war. Remember what Martin Luther King, Jr. said, "He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting it is really cooperating with it."

It's a bird, It's a plane...it's a missle

Hello all, I'm Zach, the conspiracy realist because these aren't theories we're dealing with here. This week I'll be talking about the Pentagon aspect of the 9/11 attacks. First, let's look at what we were told happened at the Pentagon. We were told that a Boeing 757 was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon. Just for kicks, I'll give you a little exerpt from Wikipedia and how they say it happened:

"In response to the conspiracy theorists claim of a missle hitting the Pentagon, Mete Sozen, a professor of civil engineering at Purdue University argues that: 'A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building. When Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, one wing hit the ground and the other was sheared off by the Pentagon's load-bearing columns.' According to ArchitectureWeek, the reason the Pentagon took relatively little damage from the impat was because Wedge One had recently been renovated. (This was part of a renovation program which had been begun in the eighties, and Wedge One was the first of five to be renovated.)"


Well first of all, a Boeing 757 has a wingspan of 125 ft. Remember how wide the hole was after the initial strike? At the widest part, it was 22 ft before the wall collapse into itself. Wait a minute...22 ft? But the plane's wingspan is over 100 ft longer than the hole initially was. How does a plane crash into a builing at 300 mph and leave a whole that small? It doesn't, there is no way that could happen, unless of course it was a skit from a cartoon, but that's just wishful thinking, obviously. It's physically impossible for the plane to leave that small a hole. If somehow you're having trouble comprehending that fact, maybe from the flouride in the water, let me help you visualize it.



There were no bodies found, no wings, tail, engines, luggage, nothing. It doesn't add up. Another thing that really gets my head itching is the fact that the surveillance cameras on surrounding buildings were all either "malfunctioning", "having their tapes changed" or got  confiscated by the FBI. To this day, the only surveillance footage that's been released to the public were a meager 5 frames from the Pentagon. And if you go look at the frames, all it really shows is a couple frames of the Pentagon and then a sudden explosion. So for any rational person, we've pretty much ruled out the possibility of a plane crash. Again, the hole isn't big enough, there were no plane parts actually found at the site, and all the surveillance footage was confiscated by the FBI except for a few frames that show only a sudden explosion.

Now let's check out another interesting piece of evidence. Anybody remember what Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld was up to the day before? On 9/10, he said that there was $2.3 TRILLION that the department couldn't account for. Yes, that's "trillion" with a 't'. How do you just misplace that much money? Am I being unreasonable or is that just ridiculous? And how is it that just a coincidence when all the records for those finances just happened to be in the room of the Pentagon that was "hit by a plane"? That's a little suspicious to me. Here's an interesting video on the subject:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQZmbxhPl2A&feature=related

So he thinks it would've taken years for an outside source to find the paper trail? And then the next day we have a supposed terrorist attack from Al-Qaeda (which is a CIA operation ran by Osama Bin Laden who was also a CIA asset at least since the 80s) which ulitimately led to dropping the investigation into the missing 2.3 trillion dollars. Seriously, how much flouride do you need to not be able to connect the dots?

9/11: What About Building 7?

Hello all, I'm Zach, I'm a "conspiracy realist" because these aren't theories we're dealing with here. This is my first ever blog so for today I figured I'd start off simple and take on the government's version of how The Soloman Brother's Building (Building 7) fell on 9/11/2001. I happened to stumble onto a site dedicated to diverting people from what really happened on that fatefull day ( www.debunking911.com ). As you may know, at 5:20 pm on 9/11, a third Building collapse in New York. It is common knowledge, according to the official story, that 4 planes were hijacked. Two of the planes hit the twin towers, one crashed into a field in Pennsylvania, and the fourth supposedly into the Pentagon (I will get into more detail involving these in the near future). In case you were wondering, no, there wasn't a plane that crashed into Building 7. So how exactly did it fall? The following is an exerpt from the afforementioned site above:

Conspiracy theorists say World Trade Center 7 is the best proof for controlled demolition because it wasn't hit by airliners and only had a few fires. They also claim that there was a confession from the building owner who said he "pulled" it. But this is deceptive because while building 7 wasn't hit by an airliner, it was hit by the large perimeter columns of the Tower collapse. It was 400 ft away but the towers were more than 1300 ft tall. As the tower peeled open, it easily tilted over to reach building 7. Below is evidence showing that conspiracy theorists are wrong.

Now I have a real problem with the above statement because if you really look into it, they didn't actually prove anything. It claims that when WTC 1 fell it tilted over 400 ft and knocked down Building 7 and it's inaccurate for a few reasons. 1) WTC 1 collapsed at 10:28 a.m., Building 7 fell almost 7 hours later at 5:20 p.m. If the North Tower really was the cause of Building 7's collapse, does it sound logical that it would've taken that long for it to fall. 2) How did the North Tower tilt when it fell to knock down Building 7 and leave Buidling 6 still standing. Looking at the map above, that doesn't add up. If that were true, it would've taken down both buildings. 3) The North Tower wasn't tilting when it collapsed. It fell into it's own footprint at freefall speed. If you don't believe me, go watch a video of the collapse, you'll notice that falling in it's own footprint is a characteristic that all 3 buildings have in common. Again, don't take my word for it, go watch the video.

The above exerpt also says we claim there is a video of the owner saying he made the decision to "pull" the building. Well if you actually take the 5 minutes or so it takes to pull up YouTube and search "larry silverstein building 7" you'll get quite a few videos seeing as how he did say exactly that. To save you some time, here is the link to the video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2q2mD2HaKA

"We'd seen such terrible loss of life, so we made the decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." I don't know about you but that seems entirely too coincidental. And if you look into controlled demolition, you'll find out that "pull" is a demolition term for bringing down a building. Another interesting fact is that Building 7 wasn't mentioned in the 9/11 commision report. Again, that seems entirely too coincidental.